EUR-Lex Court Decisions & AG Opinions

[T-475/24] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FD v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Plea of illegality – Manifest errors of assessment – Discrimination based on gender.#Case T-475/24.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-475/24 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FD v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Plea of illegality – Manifest errors of assessment – Discrimination based on gender.#Case T-475/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-475/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FD v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Re....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-786/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novomatic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark EXTRA STARS – Earlier EU figurative mark Power Stars – Relative ground for invalidity – Absence of a likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-786/25.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-786/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novomatic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark EXTRA STARS – Earlier EU figurative mark Power Stars – Relative ground for invalidity – Absence of a likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-786/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-786/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novomatic AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#E....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-128/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-C – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-128/25.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-128/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-C – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-128/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-128/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU ....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-541/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Qingdao Ecopure Filter Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Waterdrop – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-541/25.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-541/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Qingdao Ecopure Filter Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Waterdrop – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-541/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-541/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Qingdao Ecopure Filter Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual ....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-519/24] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FT v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Appointment of another candidate – Plea of illegality – Manifest errors of assessment – Discrimination based on gender – Liability.#Case T-519/24.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-519/24 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FT v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Appointment of another candidate – Plea of illegality – Manifest errors of assessment – Discrimination based on gender – Liability.#Case T-519/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-519/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FT v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Re....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-127/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-V – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-127/25.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-127/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-V – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-127/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-127/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU ....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-199/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#IO v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Psychological harassment – Dignity at Work Policy – Complaint alleging psychological harassment – Decision rejecting the complaint – Prima facie evidence of the alleged psychological harassment – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-199/25.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-199/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#IO v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Psychological harassment – Dignity at Work Policy – Complaint alleging psychological harassment – Decision rejecting the complaint – Prima facie evidence of the alleged psychological harassment – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-199/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-199/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#IO v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Ps....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-126/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-A – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-126/25.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-126/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-A – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-126/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-126/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU ....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-471/24] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FC v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Post of (senior) writer/narrator – Rejection of application – Selection criteria – Professional experience.#Case T-471/24.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-471/24 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FC v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Post of (senior) writer/narrator – Rejection of application – Selection criteria – Professional experience.#Case T-471/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-471/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#FC v European Investment Fund.#Civil service – EIF Staff – Re....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-129/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-M – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-129/25.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-129/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark MATRIX-M – Earlier EU figurative mark MATRIX OCULAR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-129/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-129/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Novavax AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU ....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-513/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Volotea, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark VOLARE – Earlier EU figurative marks VOLARE and VOLARE MAGAZINE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the goods and services – Complementary nature.#Case T-513/25.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-513/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Volotea, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark VOLARE – Earlier EU figurative marks VOLARE and VOLARE MAGAZINE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the goods and services – Complementary nature.#Case T-513/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-513/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 October 2026.#Volotea, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-383/25] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62025TJ0383

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-383/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: CELEX 62025TJ0383

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-383/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 October 2026.#Hauptzollamt A v Segelbootwartung.#Ref....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-479/25] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62025TJ0479

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-479/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: CELEX 62025TJ0479

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-479/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62025TJ0479.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-266/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 17. september 2026.#I-Sete - Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda. mod EDIA- Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S.A.#Anmodninger om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal do Porto.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – offentlige kontrakter – klageprocedurer i forbindelse med indgåelse af offentlige indkøbs- samt bygge- og anlægskontrakter – direktiv 89/665/EØF – artikel 2, stk. 3 og 5 – retslige skridt forud for indgåelsen af kontrakten – sikring af effektive klageprocedurer – automatisk opsættende virkning for procedurer for indgåelse af kontrakter – midlertidig ophævelse af den opsættende virkning – den nationale domstol, der skal træffe afgørelse om foreløbige forholdsregler – artikel 47 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – ret til et effektivt retsmiddel – foreløbig retsbeskyttelse.#Forenede sager C-266/25 og C-267/25.

Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-266/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-21

Title: Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 17. september 2026.#I-Sete - Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda. mod EDIA- Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S.A.#Anmodninger om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal do Porto.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – offentlige kontrakter – klageprocedurer i forbindelse med indgåelse af offentlige indkøbs- samt bygge- og anlægskontrakter – direktiv 89/665/EØF – artikel 2, stk. 3 og 5 – retslige skridt forud for indgåelsen af kontrakten – sikring af effektive klageprocedurer – automatisk opsættende virkning for procedurer for indgåelse af kontrakter – midlertidig ophævelse af den opsættende virkning – den nationale domstol, der skal træffe afgørelse om foreløbige forholdsregler – artikel 47 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – ret til et effektivt retsmiddel – foreløbig retsbeskyttelse.#Forenede sager C-266/25 og C-267/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-266/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#I-Sete - Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, L....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-695/23] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Concept of ‘association’ in the case of two persons with a family relationship between them.#Case C-695/23 P.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-695/23 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Concept of ‘association’ in the case of two persons with a family relationship between them.#Case C-695/23 P.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-695/23 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Appea....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-521/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Case C-521/25.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-521/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Case C-521/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-521/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Case C-521/25..

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-1/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Article 266 TFEU – Judgment of the General Court of the European Union annulling the decision not to include the appellant’s name on the reserve list for a competition – Infringement of the principle of the stability of the selection board – Implementation of that judgment by means of financial compensation – Refusal to apply a corrective factor in order to include the appellant’s name on that reserve list – Refusal to apply other non-pecuniary measures of compensation – Action for annulment and compensation – Method of determining that financial compensation – Obligation to take into account loss of opportunity – Method of determining the loss of opportunity – Ex aequo et bono assessment.#Case C-1/25 P.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-1/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Article 266 TFEU – Judgment of the General Court of the European Union annulling the decision not to include the appellant’s name on the reserve list for a competition – Infringement of the principle of the stability of the selection board – Implementation of that judgment by means of financial compensation – Refusal to apply a corrective factor in order to include the appellant’s name on that reserve list – Refusal to apply other non-pecuniary measures of compensation – Action for annulment and compensation – Method of determining that financial compensation – Obligation to take into account loss of opportunity – Method of determining the loss of opportunity – Ex aequo et bono assessment.#Case C-1/25 P.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-1/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil serv....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Art. 101/102 TFEU (EU Competition Law)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-410/25] [Court of Justice - Opinion of Advocate General] Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 15 October 2026.###

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-410/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Opinion of Advocate General | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 15 October 2026.###

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: Advocate General advises the Court of Justice on interpreting EU legal obligations in C-410/25, proposing a structured legal standard concerning Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 15 October 2026.###.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Authoritative guidance clarifying EU regulatory compliance for practitioners and legal teams ahead of final Court of Justice judgment.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-430/25] [Court of Justice - Opinion of Advocate General] Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 15 October 2026.###

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-430/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Opinion of Advocate General | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 15 October 2026.###

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: Advocate General advises the Court of Justice on interpreting EU legal obligations in C-430/25, proposing a structured legal standard concerning Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 15 October 2026.###.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Authoritative guidance clarifying EU regulatory compliance for practitioners and legal teams ahead of final Court of Justice judgment.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-627/24] [Court of Justice - Opinion of Advocate General] Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 15 October 2026.###

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-627/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Opinion of Advocate General | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 15 October 2026.###

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: Advocate General advises the Court of Justice on interpreting EU legal obligations in C-627/24, proposing a structured legal standard concerning Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 15 October 2026.###.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Authoritative guidance clarifying EU regulatory compliance for practitioners and legal teams ahead of final Court of Justice judgment.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-862/25] [Court of Justice - Opinion of Advocate General] Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 15 October 2026.###

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-862/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Opinion of Advocate General | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 15 October 2026.###

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: Advocate General advises the Court of Justice on interpreting EU legal obligations in C-862/25, proposing a structured legal standard concerning Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 15 October 2026.###.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Authoritative guidance clarifying EU regulatory compliance for practitioners and legal teams ahead of final Court of Justice judgment.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-842/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62024CJ0842

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-842/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62024CJ0842

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-842/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#DNO Yemen AS v Petrolin Trading Limited and Others.#Request for a pre....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-275/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62025CJ0275

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-275/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62025CJ0275

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-275/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Finanzamt B v A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfina....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-70/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62025CJ0070

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-70/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62025CJ0070

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-70/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#N.O. v PKO BP S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejo....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Art. 34 / 56 TFEU (Internal Market Freedoms)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-199/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62025CJ0199

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-199/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62025CJ0199

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-199/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Fluvius Halle-Vilvoorde, anciennement Sibelgas and Others v De Vlaam....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-879/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62024CJ0879

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-879/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62024CJ0879

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-879/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark.#Case C-879/24..

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-63/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62025CJ0063

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-63/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62025CJ0063

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-63/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#K. Sz. and Others v Z. Fundusz Inwestycyjny Zamknięty en liquidation.....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-842/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62024CJ0842_RES

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-842/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62024CJ0842_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-842/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62024CJ0842_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-591/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62024CJ0591_RES

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-591/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62024CJ0591_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-591/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62024CJ0591_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-199/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62025CJ0199_RES

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-199/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62025CJ0199_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-199/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62025CJ0199_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-879/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62024CJ0879_RES

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-879/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62024CJ0879_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-879/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62024CJ0879_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-580/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62024CJ0580_RES

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-580/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62024CJ0580_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-580/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62024CJ0580_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-203/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62025CJ0203_RES

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-203/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62025CJ0203_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-203/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62025CJ0203_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-477/25] [Court of Justice - Opinion of Advocate General] CELEX 62025CC0477

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-477/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Opinion of Advocate General | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62025CC0477

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: Advocate General advises the Court of Justice on interpreting EU legal obligations in C-477/25, proposing a structured legal standard concerning CELEX 62025CC0477.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Authoritative guidance clarifying EU regulatory compliance for practitioners and legal teams ahead of final Court of Justice judgment.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-568/25] [Court of Justice - Opinion of Advocate General] CELEX 62025CC0568

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-568/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Opinion of Advocate General | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: CELEX 62025CC0568

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: Advocate General advises the Court of Justice on interpreting EU legal obligations in C-568/25, proposing a structured legal standard concerning CELEX 62025CC0568.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Authoritative guidance clarifying EU regulatory compliance for practitioners and legal teams ahead of final Court of Justice judgment.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-159/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#B. Ż. og V. sp. z o.o. mod T. SA og Ł.W.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – retsstat – artikel 19, stk. 1, andet afsnit, TEU – dommeres uafhængighed – uafhængig og upartisk domstol, der er oprettet ved lov – nationale regler for fordeling og vilkårlig omfordeling af sager blandt dommere ved en retsinstans – beslutning truffet af kollegium ved en retsinstans om, på en dommers anmodning, at fratage denne en del af sagerne i vedkommendes sagsportefølje – vilkårlig omfordeling af disse sager til andre dommere ved denne retsinstans.#Sag C-159/25.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-159/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#B. Ż. og V. sp. z o.o. mod T. SA og Ł.W.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – retsstat – artikel 19, stk. 1, andet afsnit, TEU – dommeres uafhængighed – uafhængig og upartisk domstol, der er oprettet ved lov – nationale regler for fordeling og vilkårlig omfordeling af sager blandt dommere ved en retsinstans – beslutning truffet af kollegium ved en retsinstans om, på en dommers anmodning, at fratage denne en del af sagerne i vedkommendes sagsportefølje – vilkårlig omfordeling af disse sager til andre dommere ved denne retsinstans.#Sag C-159/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-159/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#B. Ż. and V. sp. z o.o. v T. SA and Ł.W.#Request for a preliminary r....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-591/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Femte Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#„Golf Bulgaria“ EOOD mod Savet za elektronni medii.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – direktiv 2010/13/EU – audiovisuelle medietjenester – artikel 1, stk. 1, litra a), nr. i) – begrebet »audiovisuelle medietjenester« – artikel 6, stk. 1 – beskyttelse af den menneskelige værdighed – national lovgivning, der forbyder udsendelser, som strider mod sædeligheden – tjenesteyderens ansvar – Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – artikel 11 – ytringsfrihed – artikel 52, stk. 1 – begrænsninger af de rettigheder og friheder, der anerkendes ved chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder.#Sag C-591/24.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-591/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Domstolens dom (Femte Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#„Golf Bulgaria“ EOOD mod Savet za elektronni medii.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – direktiv 2010/13/EU – audiovisuelle medietjenester – artikel 1, stk. 1, litra a), nr. i) – begrebet »audiovisuelle medietjenester« – artikel 6, stk. 1 – beskyttelse af den menneskelige værdighed – national lovgivning, der forbyder udsendelser, som strider mod sædeligheden – tjenesteyderens ansvar – Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – artikel 11 – ytringsfrihed – artikel 52, stk. 1 – begrænsninger af de rettigheder og friheder, der anerkendes ved chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder.#Sag C-591/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-591/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#„Golf Bulgaria“ EOOD v Savet za elektronni medii.#Request for a preli....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-203/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Fjerde Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#„NEO GROUP“ UAB mod Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – skatter og afgifter – direktiv 2011/96/EU – fælles beskatningsordning for moder- og datterselskaber fra forskellige medlemsstater – kildeskattefritagelse for udbytte, der udloddes af et hjemmehørende datterselskab til et ikkehjemmehørende moderselskab – artikel 1, stk. 2 og 3 – bestemmelse om bekæmpelse af misbrug – arrangement, der ikke er reelt – trin i et arrangement – transaktionskæde – objektiv analyse af alle relevante faktiske forhold og omstændigheder – retmæssig ejer af udbyttet – skattefordel – den medlemsstat eller det trin, hvor denne fordel er opnået, ikke af betydning – subjektivt forhold – påvisning af eksistensen heraf i forhold til en af deltagerne i den pågældende transaktionskæde – proportionalitetsprincip – bilateral overenskomst til undgåelse af dobbeltbeskatning.#Sag C-203/25.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-203/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Domstolens dom (Fjerde Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#„NEO GROUP“ UAB mod Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – skatter og afgifter – direktiv 2011/96/EU – fælles beskatningsordning for moder- og datterselskaber fra forskellige medlemsstater – kildeskattefritagelse for udbytte, der udloddes af et hjemmehørende datterselskab til et ikkehjemmehørende moderselskab – artikel 1, stk. 2 og 3 – bestemmelse om bekæmpelse af misbrug – arrangement, der ikke er reelt – trin i et arrangement – transaktionskæde – objektiv analyse af alle relevante faktiske forhold og omstændigheder – retmæssig ejer af udbyttet – skattefordel – den medlemsstat eller det trin, hvor denne fordel er opnået, ikke af betydning – subjektivt forhold – påvisning af eksistensen heraf i forhold til en af deltagerne i den pågældende transaktionskæde – proportionalitetsprincip – bilateral overenskomst til undgåelse af dobbeltbeskatning.#Sag C-203/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-203/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#„NEO GROUP“ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respu....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-161/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Fjerde Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#Autorità di regolazione dei trasporti mod Captrain Italia m.fl.#Anmodninger om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Consiglio di Stato.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – transport med jernbane – direktiv 2012/34/EU – det fælles jernbaneområde – artikel 35 – præstationsordning – rækkevidde – sanktioner for jernbanevirksomhedernes forstyrrelse – almindelig sanktionsordning, der finder anvendelse på hele det nationale net i tilfælde af forsinkelse – sanktioner, der, alt efter hvilken enhed forsinkelsen kan tilregnes, kan pålægges enten infrastrukturforvalteren eller jernbanevirksomheden – særlig sanktionsordning, der finder anvendelse i tilfælde af overskridelse af opholdstiden på stationer med tilslutning til udenlandske jernbanenet – sanktioner, der pålægges de enkelte jernbanevirksomheder – mulighed for at kumulere flere sanktionsordninger – betingelser herfor – bilag VI, punkt 2 – overholdelse af de grundprincipperne for præstationsordningen – artikel 56 – tilsynsorgan – omfanget af prøvelsen – proportionalitetsprincippet.#Forenede sager C-161/25 og C-162/25.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-161/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Domstolens dom (Fjerde Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#Autorità di regolazione dei trasporti mod Captrain Italia m.fl.#Anmodninger om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Consiglio di Stato.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – transport med jernbane – direktiv 2012/34/EU – det fælles jernbaneområde – artikel 35 – præstationsordning – rækkevidde – sanktioner for jernbanevirksomhedernes forstyrrelse – almindelig sanktionsordning, der finder anvendelse på hele det nationale net i tilfælde af forsinkelse – sanktioner, der, alt efter hvilken enhed forsinkelsen kan tilregnes, kan pålægges enten infrastrukturforvalteren eller jernbanevirksomheden – særlig sanktionsordning, der finder anvendelse i tilfælde af overskridelse af opholdstiden på stationer med tilslutning til udenlandske jernbanenet – sanktioner, der pålægges de enkelte jernbanevirksomheder – mulighed for at kumulere flere sanktionsordninger – betingelser herfor – bilag VI, punkt 2 – overholdelse af de grundprincipperne for præstationsordningen – artikel 56 – tilsynsorgan – omfanget af prøvelsen – proportionalitetsprincippet.#Forenede sager C-161/25 og C-162/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-161/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Autorità di regolazione dei trasporti v Captrain Italia and Others.#....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-321/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura mod „А“ m.fl.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Sofiyski gradski sad.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – område med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed – retligt samarbejde i straffesager – bekæmpelse af organiseret kriminalitet – beskyttelse af Den Europæiske Unions finansielle interesser – artikel 325, stk. 1, TEUF – BFI-konventionen – artikel 2, stk. 1 – rammeafgørelse 2008/841/RIA – artikel 2, litra a) og b) – alvorlig merværdiafgiftssvig – aftale om at begå en strafbar handling – artikel 3 – medlemsstaternes forpligtelse til at bekæmpe svig, der skader Unionens finansielle interesser, ved hjælp af afskrækkende og effektive foranstaltninger – forpligtelse til at fastsætte strafferetlige sanktioner – straffens maksimale varighed – proportionalitetsprincippet – forældelsesfrist – systemisk risiko for straffrihed.#Sag C-321/25.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-321/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura mod „А“ m.fl.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Sofiyski gradski sad.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – område med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed – retligt samarbejde i straffesager – bekæmpelse af organiseret kriminalitet – beskyttelse af Den Europæiske Unions finansielle interesser – artikel 325, stk. 1, TEUF – BFI-konventionen – artikel 2, stk. 1 – rammeafgørelse 2008/841/RIA – artikel 2, litra a) og b) – alvorlig merværdiafgiftssvig – aftale om at begå en strafbar handling – artikel 3 – medlemsstaternes forpligtelse til at bekæmpe svig, der skader Unionens finansielle interesser, ved hjælp af afskrækkende og effektive foranstaltninger – forpligtelse til at fastsætte strafferetlige sanktioner – straffens maksimale varighed – proportionalitetsprincippet – forældelsesfrist – systemisk risiko for straffrihed.#Sag C-321/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-321/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v „А“ and Others.#Request for a prelimin....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-857/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#daa plc, anciennement Dublin Airport Authority plc m.fl. mod Irish Aviation Authority og Airport Coordination Limited.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af High Court (Irlande).#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – lufttransport – forordning (EØF) nr. 95/93 – tildeling af slots i Den Europæiske Unions lufthavne – artikel 6 – koordineringsparametre – fastsættelse under hensyntagen til relevante tekniske, operationelle og miljømæssige begrænsninger – byplanlægningsregler – begrænsning af det årlige antal flypassagerer – artikel 8 – tildeling af slots – hidtidige slots – hævdvundne rettigheder – artikel 16 og 17 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder.#Sag C-857/24.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-857/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#daa plc, anciennement Dublin Airport Authority plc m.fl. mod Irish Aviation Authority og Airport Coordination Limited.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af High Court (Irlande).#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – lufttransport – forordning (EØF) nr. 95/93 – tildeling af slots i Den Europæiske Unions lufthavne – artikel 6 – koordineringsparametre – fastsættelse under hensyntagen til relevante tekniske, operationelle og miljømæssige begrænsninger – byplanlægningsregler – begrænsning af det årlige antal flypassagerer – artikel 8 – tildeling af slots – hidtidige slots – hævdvundne rettigheder – artikel 16 og 17 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder.#Sag C-857/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-857/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#daa plc, anciennement Dublin Airport Authority plc and Others v Iris....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-580/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Femte Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura mod LY.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Sofiyski gradski sad.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – retligt samarbejde i straffesager – europæisk arrestordre – rammeafgørelse 2002/584/RIA – artikel 12 – varetægtsfængsling af den eftersøgte – artikel 23 – frist for overgivelse af denne person – national lovgivning, der fastsætter en forpligtelse til at frihedsberøve den eftersøgte i et fængsel indtil overgivelsen af den pågældende til den udstedende medlemsstat – artikel 6 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – ret til frihed og sikkerhed.#Sag C-580/24.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-580/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Domstolens dom (Femte Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura mod LY.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Sofiyski gradski sad.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – retligt samarbejde i straffesager – europæisk arrestordre – rammeafgørelse 2002/584/RIA – artikel 12 – varetægtsfængsling af den eftersøgte – artikel 23 – frist for overgivelse af denne person – national lovgivning, der fastsætter en forpligtelse til at frihedsberøve den eftersøgte i et fængsel indtil overgivelsen af den pågældende til den udstedende medlemsstat – artikel 6 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – ret til frihed og sikkerhed.#Sag C-580/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-580/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v LY.#Request for a preliminary ruling f....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-120/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Første Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#Verband Wirtschaft im Wettbewerb, Verein für Lauterkeit in Handel und Industrie e.V. mod PAYBACK GmbH.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Bundesgerichtshof.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – energi – energimærkning – forordning (EU) 2017/1369 – artikel 2, nr. 13) – begrebet »forhandler« – begreberne »udstill[ing]« og »erhvervsvirksomhed« – artikel 2, nr. 16) – begrebet »kunde« – artikel 6, stk. 1, litra a) – forpligtelse til at henvise til et produkts energieffektivitetsklasse og de tilgængelige effektivitetsklasser på mærket i visuel reklame – begrebet »visuel reklame« – lodtrækning på internettet – arrangør af en lodtrækning på internettet med et fjernsyn som gevinst – delegeret forordning (EU) 2019/2013 – artikel 4, litra d).#Sag C-120/25.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-120/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Domstolens dom (Første Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#Verband Wirtschaft im Wettbewerb, Verein für Lauterkeit in Handel und Industrie e.V. mod PAYBACK GmbH.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Bundesgerichtshof.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – energi – energimærkning – forordning (EU) 2017/1369 – artikel 2, nr. 13) – begrebet »forhandler« – begreberne »udstill[ing]« og »erhvervsvirksomhed« – artikel 2, nr. 16) – begrebet »kunde« – artikel 6, stk. 1, litra a) – forpligtelse til at henvise til et produkts energieffektivitetsklasse og de tilgængelige effektivitetsklasser på mærket i visuel reklame – begrebet »visuel reklame« – lodtrækning på internettet – arrangør af en lodtrækning på internettet med et fjernsyn som gevinst – delegeret forordning (EU) 2019/2013 – artikel 4, litra d).#Sag C-120/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-120/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Verband Wirtschaft im Wettbewerb, Verein für Lauterkeit in Handel und....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-402/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Syvende Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#Plungės rajono savivaldybės administracija mod Viešųjų pirkimų tarnyba.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Lietuvos administracinių ginčų komisija.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – offentlige kontrakter – direktiv 2014/24/EU – tildeling af kontrakter – artikel 57, stk. 4, første afsnit, litra d), og artikel 57, stk. 6 og 7 – fakultative grunde til udelukkelse fra deltagelse i en udbudsprocedure – en økonomisk aktørs fremlæggelse af falske oplysninger vedrørende overholdelsen af betingelserne om formåen – opførelse på en liste over leverandører, der har fremlagt falske oplysninger under en udbudsprocedure – artikel 18, stk. 1 – proportionalitetsprincippet – direktiv 89/665/EØF – artikel 1 – adgang til effektive retsmidler.#Sag C-402/25.

Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-402/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-15

Title: Domstolens dom (Syvende Afdeling) af 15. oktober 2026.#Plungės rajono savivaldybės administracija mod Viešųjų pirkimų tarnyba.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Lietuvos administracinių ginčų komisija.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – offentlige kontrakter – direktiv 2014/24/EU – tildeling af kontrakter – artikel 57, stk. 4, første afsnit, litra d), og artikel 57, stk. 6 og 7 – fakultative grunde til udelukkelse fra deltagelse i en udbudsprocedure – en økonomisk aktørs fremlæggelse af falske oplysninger vedrørende overholdelsen af betingelserne om formåen – opførelse på en liste over leverandører, der har fremlagt falske oplysninger under en udbudsprocedure – artikel 18, stk. 1 – proportionalitetsprincippet – direktiv 89/665/EØF – artikel 1 – adgang til effektive retsmidler.#Sag C-402/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-402/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2026.#Plungės rajono savivaldybės administracija v Viešųjų pirkimų tarnyb....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-814/25] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62025TJ0814_INF

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-814/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: CELEX 62025TJ0814_INF

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-814/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62025TJ0814_INF.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-814/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Holding Tourisme v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MAGORA – Earlier EU figurative mark GRUPO AGORA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-814/25.

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-814/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Holding Tourisme v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MAGORA – Earlier EU figurative mark GRUPO AGORA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-814/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-814/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Holding Tourisme v European Union Intellectual Property Offic....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-205/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Giulio Cesare Rizza v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Form annexed to a request for assistance sent by a national competition authority to the national competition authority of another Member State – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest.#Case T-205/25.

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-205/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Giulio Cesare Rizza v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Form annexed to a request for assistance sent by a national competition authority to the national competition authority of another Member State – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest.#Case T-205/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-205/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Giulio Cesare Rizza v European Commission.#Access to documen....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Art. 101/102 TFEU (EU Competition Law)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-537/24] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#GC v Single Resolution Board.#Civil service – Staff of the SRB – Members of the temporary staff – Probationary period – Internal reorganisation of the SRB’s services – Dismissal decision at the end of the probationary period – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-537/24.

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-537/24 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#GC v Single Resolution Board.#Civil service – Staff of the SRB – Members of the temporary staff – Probationary period – Internal reorganisation of the SRB’s services – Dismissal decision at the end of the probationary period – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-537/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-537/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#GC v Single Resolution Board.#Civil service – Staff of the SR....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-770/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Adema Srl v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Application for a Community plant variety right for the apple variety Roat – Examination of the facts by the Community Plant Variety Office of its own motion – Article 76 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Technical examination – Distinctness – Test guidelines – Absence of a new characteristic.#Case T-770/25.

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-770/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Adema Srl v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Application for a Community plant variety right for the apple variety Roat – Examination of the facts by the Community Plant Variety Office of its own motion – Article 76 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Technical examination – Distinctness – Test guidelines – Absence of a new characteristic.#Case T-770/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-770/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Adema Srl v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties ....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-561/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Anas Talas v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Fall of the regime of Bashar al-Assad – Presumption of a link with the former regime of Bashar al-Assad – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment.#Case T-561/25.

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-561/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Anas Talas v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Fall of the regime of Bashar al-Assad – Presumption of a link with the former regime of Bashar al-Assad – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment.#Case T-561/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-561/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Anas Talas v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign an....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-134/24] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 October 2026.#Technius LTD v European Commission.#Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Designation as a very large online platform – Continued interest in bringing proceedings – No finding that there is no need to adjudicate – Plea of illegality – Article 33(1) and (4) of Regulation 2022/2065 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Right to be heard – Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-134/24.

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-134/24 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 October 2026.#Technius LTD v European Commission.#Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Designation as a very large online platform – Continued interest in bringing proceedings – No finding that there is no need to adjudicate – Plea of illegality – Article 33(1) and (4) of Regulation 2022/2065 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Right to be heard – Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-134/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-134/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 October 2026.#Technius LTD v European Commission.#D....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 (DMA) / 2022/2065 (DSA)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-506/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#GY v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Remuneration – Family allowances – Household allowance – Dependent child allowance – Education allowance – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpayments – Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Right to receive social security benefits and social advantages – Article 34 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Principle of good administration – Duty of care – Legal certainty – Misuse of powers.#Case T-506/25.

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-506/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#GY v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Remuneration – Family allowances – Household allowance – Dependent child allowance – Education allowance – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpayments – Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Right to receive social security benefits and social advantages – Article 34 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Principle of good administration – Duty of care – Legal certainty – Misuse of powers.#Case T-506/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-506/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#GY v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temp....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-134/24] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62024TJ0134_RES

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-134/24 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: CELEX 62024TJ0134_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-134/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62024TJ0134_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-451/25] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62025TJ0451_RES

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-451/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: CELEX 62025TJ0451_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-451/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62025TJ0451_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-569/25] [General Court - Judgment] Rettens dom (Anden Udvidede Afdeling) af 14. oktober 2026.#X-GmbH mod Finanzamt Y.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Bundesfinanzhof.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – skatter og afgifter – det fælles momssystem – fortjenstmargenordningen – artikel 314 i direktiv 2006/112/EF – de nationale afgiftsmyndigheders afslag på at give en afgiftspligtig ret til at anvende fortjenstmargenordningen – god tro – særlig national procedure – effektivitetsprincip.#Sag T-569/25.

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-569/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: Rettens dom (Anden Udvidede Afdeling) af 14. oktober 2026.#X-GmbH mod Finanzamt Y.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Bundesfinanzhof.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – skatter og afgifter – det fælles momssystem – fortjenstmargenordningen – artikel 314 i direktiv 2006/112/EF – de nationale afgiftsmyndigheders afslag på at give en afgiftspligtig ret til at anvende fortjenstmargenordningen – god tro – særlig national procedure – effektivitetsprincip.#Sag T-569/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-569/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 October 2026.#X-GmbH v Finanzamt Y.#Request for a pr....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-451/25] [General Court - Judgment] Rettens dom (Syvende Afdeling) af 14. oktober 2026.#Mega Pop podjetje za oglaševanje na prostem d.o.o. mod Den Europæiske Unions Kontor for Intellektuel Ejendomsret.#EU-varemærker – fortabelsessag – international registrering, hvor Den Europæiske Union er designeret – ordmærket FIND MY CAR – erklæring om fortabelse – antagelse af klagen til realitetsbehandling ved appelkammeret – begrundelse for klagen indgivet for sent – forlængelse af fristen – begæring om restitutio in integrum.#Sag T-451/25.

Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-451/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-14

Title: Rettens dom (Syvende Afdeling) af 14. oktober 2026.#Mega Pop podjetje za oglaševanje na prostem d.o.o. mod Den Europæiske Unions Kontor for Intellektuel Ejendomsret.#EU-varemærker – fortabelsessag – international registrering, hvor Den Europæiske Union er designeret – ordmærket FIND MY CAR – erklæring om fortabelse – antagelse af klagen til realitetsbehandling ved appelkammeret – begrundelse for klagen indgivet for sent – forlængelse af fristen – begæring om restitutio in integrum.#Sag T-451/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-451/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 October 2026.#Mega Pop podjetje za oglaševanje na prostem d.o.o. v Europe....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-224/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#La Maison de l'Union syndicale v Council of the European Union.#Case C-224/25 P.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-224/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#La Maison de l'Union syndicale v Council of the European Union.#Case C-224/25 P.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-224/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#La Maison de l'Union syndicale v Council of the European Union.#Case C....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-572/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Brasserie Nationale and Munhowen SA v European Commission.#Case C-572/25 P.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-572/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Brasserie Nationale and Munhowen SA v European Commission.#Case C-572/25 P.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-572/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Brasserie Nationale and Munhowen SA v European Commission.#Case C-57....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-706/23] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Şcoala gimnazială « Mihai Eminescu » Vaslui v Uniunea Sindicală « Didactica » Vaslui au nom et pour ses membres and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Right to paid annual leave – Article 7(1) – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Framework agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC – Clause 4.1 – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4.1 – Principle of non-discrimination – Principle pro rata temporis – Accumulation of separate contracts of employment – Teaching staff hired on the basis of a full-time employment contract of indefinite duration and a part-time fixed-term employment contract – Remuneration payable in respect of paid annual leave calculated solely on the basis of the full-time employment contract of indefinite duration – Meal allowance granted solely in relation to the actual working time completed in performing the full-time employment contract of indefinite duration.#Case C-706/23.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-706/23 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Şcoala gimnazială « Mihai Eminescu » Vaslui v Uniunea Sindicală « Didactica » Vaslui au nom et pour ses membres and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Right to paid annual leave – Article 7(1) – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Framework agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC – Clause 4.1 – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4.1 – Principle of non-discrimination – Principle pro rata temporis – Accumulation of separate contracts of employment – Teaching staff hired on the basis of a full-time employment contract of indefinite duration and a part-time fixed-term employment contract – Remuneration payable in respect of paid annual leave calculated solely on the basis of the full-time employment contract of indefinite duration – Meal allowance granted solely in relation to the actual working time completed in performing the full-time employment contract of indefinite duration.#Case C-706/23.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-706/23 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Şcoala gimnazială « Mihai Eminescu » Vaslui v Uniunea Sindicală « Dida....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-57/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#European Commission v Republic of Estonia.#Case C-57/25.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-57/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#European Commission v Republic of Estonia.#Case C-57/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-57/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#European Commission v Republic of Estonia.#Case C-57/25..

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-173/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Agropalma Holdings Ltda and Others v European Commission.#Case C-173/25 P.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-173/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Agropalma Holdings Ltda and Others v European Commission.#Case C-173/25 P.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-173/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Agropalma Holdings Ltda and Others v European Commission.#Case C-173....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-390/25] [Court of Justice - Opinion of Advocate General] Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 8 October 2026.###

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-390/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Opinion of Advocate General | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 8 October 2026.###

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: Advocate General advises the Court of Justice on interpreting EU legal obligations in C-390/25, proposing a structured legal standard concerning Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 8 October 2026.###.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Authoritative guidance clarifying EU regulatory compliance for practitioners and legal teams ahead of final Court of Justice judgment.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-222/25] [Court of Justice - Opinion of Advocate General] Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 8 October 2026.###

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-222/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Opinion of Advocate General | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 8 October 2026.###

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: Advocate General advises the Court of Justice on interpreting EU legal obligations in C-222/25, proposing a structured legal standard concerning Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 8 October 2026.###.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Authoritative guidance clarifying EU regulatory compliance for practitioners and legal teams ahead of final Court of Justice judgment.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-893/24] [Court of Justice - Opinion of Advocate General] Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 8 October 2026.###

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-893/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Opinion of Advocate General | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 8 October 2026.###

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: Advocate General advises the Court of Justice on interpreting EU legal obligations in C-893/24, proposing a structured legal standard concerning Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 8 October 2026.###.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Authoritative guidance clarifying EU regulatory compliance for practitioners and legal teams ahead of final Court of Justice judgment.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-808/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62024CJ0808_RES

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-808/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: CELEX 62024CJ0808_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-808/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62024CJ0808_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-482/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62024CJ0482_RES

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-482/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: CELEX 62024CJ0482_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-482/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62024CJ0482_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-571/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62024CJ0571_RES

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-571/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: CELEX 62024CJ0571_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-571/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62024CJ0571_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-173/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62025CJ0173_INF

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-173/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: CELEX 62025CJ0173_INF

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-173/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62025CJ0173_INF.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-108/26] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.##Fornyet prøvelse af Den Europæiske Unions Rets dom af 21. januar 2026, D (Beslutning, der træffes som led i lufttrafikstyringen) (T-134/25, EU:T:2026:35) – præjudiciel forelæggelse – lufttransport – forordning (EF) nr. 261/2004 – kompensation til passagerer i tilfælde af lange forsinkelser af en flyafgang – betingelser – artikel 5, stk. 3 – begrebet »usædvanlige omstændigheder« – beslutning, der træffes som led i lufttrafikstyringen – tildeling af senere afgangstidspunkter (slots) for flyvninger som følge af dårlige vejrforhold – påvirkning af EU-rettens ensartede anvendelse og sammenhæng.#Sag C-108/26 RX.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-108/26 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.##Fornyet prøvelse af Den Europæiske Unions Rets dom af 21. januar 2026, D (Beslutning, der træffes som led i lufttrafikstyringen) (T-134/25, EU:T:2026:35) – præjudiciel forelæggelse – lufttransport – forordning (EF) nr. 261/2004 – kompensation til passagerer i tilfælde af lange forsinkelser af en flyafgang – betingelser – artikel 5, stk. 3 – begrebet »usædvanlige omstændigheder« – beslutning, der træffes som led i lufttrafikstyringen – tildeling af senere afgangstidspunkter (slots) for flyvninger som følge af dårlige vejrforhold – påvirkning af EU-rettens ensartede anvendelse og sammenhæng.#Sag C-108/26 RX.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-108/26 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 October 2026.##Review of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-571/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Fjerde Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.#YO og CT mod Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – område med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed – indvandringspolitik – ret til familiesammenføring – direktiv 2003/86/EF – artikel 10, stk. 3 – en flygtnings ret til familiesammenføring med sine forældre – begrebet »uledsaget mindreårig« – ansøgning om familiesammenføring indgivet af forældre til en mindreårig flygtning, der er blevet myndig under asylproceduren – rækkevidden af dom af 12. april 2018, A og S (C-550/16, EU:C:2018:248) – rimelig frist for indgivelse af denne ansøgning – fristens begyndelsestidspunkt – ret til respekt for privatliv og familieliv – barnets tarv – artikel 7 og 24 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder.#Sag C-571/24.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-571/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Domstolens dom (Fjerde Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.#YO og CT mod Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – område med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed – indvandringspolitik – ret til familiesammenføring – direktiv 2003/86/EF – artikel 10, stk. 3 – en flygtnings ret til familiesammenføring med sine forældre – begrebet »uledsaget mindreårig« – ansøgning om familiesammenføring indgivet af forældre til en mindreårig flygtning, der er blevet myndig under asylproceduren – rækkevidden af dom af 12. april 2018, A og S (C-550/16, EU:C:2018:248) – rimelig frist for indgivelse af denne ansøgning – fristens begyndelsestidspunkt – ret til respekt for privatliv og familieliv – barnets tarv – artikel 7 og 24 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder.#Sag C-571/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-571/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#YO and CT v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary rul....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-872/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Ottende Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.#Digi România SA mod VK.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Tribunalul Arad.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – forbrugerbeskyttelse – direktiv 93/13/EØF – urimelige kontraktvilkår i forbrugeraftaler – artikel 3, stk. 1 og 3, samt bilagets punkt 1, litra e) – begrebet »urimeligt kontraktvilkår« – kontraktvilkår, hvis formål eller virkning er at pålægge en forbruger, der ikke opfylder sine forpligtelser, en uforholdsmæssigt stor godtgørelse – artikel 4, stk. 2 – kontraktvilkår, der falder ind under definitionen af aftalens hovedgenstand – aftaler om levering af elektroniske kommunikationstjenester mellem en forbruger og en erhvervsdrivende – kontraktvilkår, der pålægger forbrugeren en bøde for hver dags forsinket betaling – kontraktvilkår, der pålægger forbrugeren, i tilfælde af ophævelse af aftalen før udløbet af den minimale bindingsperiode af en grund, der kan tilregnes forbrugeren, at betale den erhvervsdrivende det skyldige beløb for den resterende del af perioden.#Sag C-872/24.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-872/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Domstolens dom (Ottende Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.#Digi România SA mod VK.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Tribunalul Arad.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – forbrugerbeskyttelse – direktiv 93/13/EØF – urimelige kontraktvilkår i forbrugeraftaler – artikel 3, stk. 1 og 3, samt bilagets punkt 1, litra e) – begrebet »urimeligt kontraktvilkår« – kontraktvilkår, hvis formål eller virkning er at pålægge en forbruger, der ikke opfylder sine forpligtelser, en uforholdsmæssigt stor godtgørelse – artikel 4, stk. 2 – kontraktvilkår, der falder ind under definitionen af aftalens hovedgenstand – aftaler om levering af elektroniske kommunikationstjenester mellem en forbruger og en erhvervsdrivende – kontraktvilkår, der pålægger forbrugeren en bøde for hver dags forsinket betaling – kontraktvilkår, der pålægger forbrugeren, i tilfælde af ophævelse af aftalen før udløbet af den minimale bindingsperiode af en grund, der kan tilregnes forbrugeren, at betale den erhvervsdrivende det skyldige beløb for den resterende del af perioden.#Sag C-872/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-872/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Digi România SA v VK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribu....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-808/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Første Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.#M. R. mod Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Okresný súd Lučenec.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – socialpolitik – direktiv 2003/88/EF – artikel 2, nr. 1) – begrebet »arbejdstid« – artikel 6, litra b) – maksimal ugentlig arbejdstid – beskyttelse af arbejdstageres sikkerhed og sundhed – arbejdstid for brandmænd – tilkaldevagt på arbejdsstedet, som ikke medregnes i arbejdstiden – ret til erstatning for ikkeøkonomisk skade, som gøres gældende over for en medlemsstat for tilsidesættelse af EU-retten – betingelser – metode til beregning af erstatningen for den skade, der er lidt som følge af tilsidesættelsen af artikel 6, litra b), i direktiv 2003/88 – ækvivalensprincippet – effektivitetsprincippet.#Sag C-808/24.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-808/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Domstolens dom (Første Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.#M. R. mod Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Okresný súd Lučenec.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – socialpolitik – direktiv 2003/88/EF – artikel 2, nr. 1) – begrebet »arbejdstid« – artikel 6, litra b) – maksimal ugentlig arbejdstid – beskyttelse af arbejdstageres sikkerhed og sundhed – arbejdstid for brandmænd – tilkaldevagt på arbejdsstedet, som ikke medregnes i arbejdstiden – ret til erstatning for ikkeøkonomisk skade, som gøres gældende over for en medlemsstat for tilsidesættelse af EU-retten – betingelser – metode til beregning af erstatningen for den skade, der er lidt som følge af tilsidesættelsen af artikel 6, litra b), i direktiv 2003/88 – ækvivalensprincippet – effektivitetsprincippet.#Sag C-808/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-808/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#M. R. v Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky.#Request for a prelim....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-482/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Første Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.#Global 8 Airlines mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Appel – fælles udenrigs- og sikkerhedspolitik – restriktive foranstaltninger truffet i lyset af den militære aggression mod Ukraine – forordning (EU) 2022/334 om ændring af forordning (EU) nr. 833/2014 – artikel 3d og 3e – forbud for alle ikkerussisk registrerede luftfartøjer, som ejes eller chartres eller på anden måde kontrolleres af russiske fysiske eller juridiske personer, enheder eller organer, mod at lande på, lette fra eller overflyve Den Europæiske Unions område – afvisning af flyveplan – annullationssøgsmål – formaliteten – retsakt, der kan gøres til genstand for et søgsmål.#Sag C-482/24 P.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-482/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Domstolens dom (Første Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.#Global 8 Airlines mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Appel – fælles udenrigs- og sikkerhedspolitik – restriktive foranstaltninger truffet i lyset af den militære aggression mod Ukraine – forordning (EU) 2022/334 om ændring af forordning (EU) nr. 833/2014 – artikel 3d og 3e – forbud for alle ikkerussisk registrerede luftfartøjer, som ejes eller chartres eller på anden måde kontrolleres af russiske fysiske eller juridiske personer, enheder eller organer, mod at lande på, lette fra eller overflyve Den Europæiske Unions område – afvisning af flyveplan – annullationssøgsmål – formaliteten – retsakt, der kan gøres til genstand for et søgsmål.#Sag C-482/24 P.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-482/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#Global 8 Airlines v European Commission.#Appeal – Common foreign and s....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-706/23] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Første Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.#Şcoala gimnazială « Mihai Eminescu » Vaslui mod Uniunea Sindicală « Didactica » Vaslui au nom et pour ses membres m.fl.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Curtea de Apel Iaşi.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – socialpolitik – direktiv 2003/88/EF – ret til årlig betalt ferie – artikel 7, stk. 1 – artikel 31, stk. 2, i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – rammeaftalen om deltidsarbejde, der er indgået af EFS, UNICE og CEEP – § 4, stk. 1 – rammeaftalen om tidsbegrænset ansættelse, der er indgået af EFS, UNICE og CEEP – § 4, stk. 1 – princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling – princippet pro rata temporis – kumulation af særskilte ansættelseskontrakter – undervisningspersonale, der er ansat på en tidsubegrænset fuldtidsansættelseskontrakt og på en tidsbegrænset deltidsansættelseskontrakt – løn, der skal betales under den årlige betalte ferie, og som alene beregnes på grundlag af den tidsubegrænsede fuldtidsansættelseskontrakt – tildeling af et forplejningstillæg under hensyntagen til den faktiske arbejdstid, der er udført alene på grundlag af den tidsubegrænsede fuldtidsansættelseskontrakt.#Sag C-706/23.

Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-706/23 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-08

Title: Domstolens dom (Første Afdeling) af 8. oktober 2026.#Şcoala gimnazială « Mihai Eminescu » Vaslui mod Uniunea Sindicală « Didactica » Vaslui au nom et pour ses membres m.fl.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Curtea de Apel Iaşi.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – socialpolitik – direktiv 2003/88/EF – ret til årlig betalt ferie – artikel 7, stk. 1 – artikel 31, stk. 2, i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – rammeaftalen om deltidsarbejde, der er indgået af EFS, UNICE og CEEP – § 4, stk. 1 – rammeaftalen om tidsbegrænset ansættelse, der er indgået af EFS, UNICE og CEEP – § 4, stk. 1 – princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling – princippet pro rata temporis – kumulation af særskilte ansættelseskontrakter – undervisningspersonale, der er ansat på en tidsubegrænset fuldtidsansættelseskontrakt og på en tidsbegrænset deltidsansættelseskontrakt – løn, der skal betales under den årlige betalte ferie, og som alene beregnes på grundlag af den tidsubegrænsede fuldtidsansættelseskontrakt – tildeling af et forplejningstillæg under hensyntagen til den faktiske arbejdstid, der er udført alene på grundlag af den tidsubegrænsede fuldtidsansættelseskontrakt.#Sag C-706/23.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-86/26] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Abacco’s GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ABACCO’S STEAKHOUSE – Earlier national word mark ABAC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-86/26.

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-86/26 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Abacco’s GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ABACCO’S STEAKHOUSE – Earlier national word mark ABAC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-86/26.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-86/26 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Abacco’s GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#E....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-408/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#JS v European Parliament.#Case T-408/25.

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-408/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#JS v European Parliament.#Case T-408/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-408/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#JS v European Parliament.#Case T-408/25..

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-371/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Dentek Oral Care, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark dentix – Earlier EU word marks DENTEK and earlier EU figurative marks DenTek – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/25.

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-371/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Dentek Oral Care, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark dentix – Earlier EU word marks DENTEK and earlier EU figurative marks DenTek – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-371/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Dentek Oral Care, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property ....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-807/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Boguslayev v Council of the European Union.#Case T-807/25.

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-807/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Boguslayev v Council of the European Union.#Case T-807/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-807/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Boguslayev v Council of the European....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-631/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Salumanus sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark lightoptics – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Absence of bad faith – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 60(2)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No earlier copyright acquired under national law.#Case T-631/25.

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-631/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Salumanus sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark lightoptics – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Absence of bad faith – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 60(2)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No earlier copyright acquired under national law.#Case T-631/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-631/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Salumanus sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Of....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-529/25] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62025TJ0529

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-529/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: CELEX 62025TJ0529

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-529/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 October 2026.#European Public Prosecutor’s Office and ....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-773/25] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62025TJ0773

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-773/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: CELEX 62025TJ0773

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-773/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 October 2026.#Finanzamt für Großbetriebe v F GmbH.#Re....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-529/25] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62025TJ0529_RES

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-529/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: CELEX 62025TJ0529_RES

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-529/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62025TJ0529_RES.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-86/26] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62026TJ0086_INF

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-86/26 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: CELEX 62026TJ0086_INF

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-86/26 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62026TJ0086_INF.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-559/25] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Fiber Experts Deutschland GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-559/25.

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-559/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Fiber Experts Deutschland GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-559/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-559/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Fiber Experts Deutschland GmbH v European Union Intellectual P....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-9/26] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Milestone Sportswear Handels GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MID season For When It’s Not Quite Cold Not Quite Warm – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-9/26.

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-9/26 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Milestone Sportswear Handels GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MID season For When It’s Not Quite Cold Not Quite Warm – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-9/26.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-9/26 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Milestone Sportswear Handels GmbH v European Union Intellect....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EU Trade Mark)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-203/24] [General Court - Judgment] Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Zalando SE v European Commission.#Case T-203/24.

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-203/24 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Zalando SE v European Commission.#Case T-203/24.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-203/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Zalando SE v European Commission.#Case T-203/24..

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-9/26] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62026TJ0009_INF

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-9/26 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: CELEX 62026TJ0009_INF

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-9/26 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62026TJ0009_INF.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-631/25] [General Court - Judgment] CELEX 62025TJ0631_INF

Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-631/25 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-07

Title: CELEX 62025TJ0631_INF

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-631/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62025TJ0631_INF.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-209/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] CELEX 62025CJ0209_SUM

Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-209/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-01

Title: CELEX 62025CJ0209_SUM

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-209/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding CELEX 62025CJ0209_SUM.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-131/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 October 2026.#Axel Dris v Gouvernement de la Communauté française.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Principle of non-discrimination – Access to higher education – Enrolment as first-year medical student – Quota capping non-resident students – Candidate for medical studies who completed his secondary education in the Member State concerned while residing in another Member State.#Case C-131/25.

Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-131/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-01

Title: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 October 2026.#Axel Dris v Gouvernement de la Communauté française.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Principle of non-discrimination – Access to higher education – Enrolment as first-year medical student – Quota capping non-resident students – Candidate for medical studies who completed his secondary education in the Member State concerned while residing in another Member State.#Case C-131/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-131/25 establishing legal boundaries regarding Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 October 2026.#Axel Dris v Gouvernement de la Communauté française.#Request for a pre....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-459/25] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Niende Afdeling) af 1. oktober 2026.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – forbrugerbeskyttelse – direktiv 93/13/EØF – artikel 6, stk. 1, og artikel 7, stk. 1 – urimelige kontraktvilkår i forbrugeraftaler – lejekontrakt – klausul om, at samtlige omkostninger i forbindelse med retssagen skal bæres af lejeren, i tilfælde af at lejeren misligholder sine kontraktlige forpligtelser – virkningerne af, at dette vilkår findes urimeligt – anvendelse af deklaratoriske bestemmelser i national ret – fordeling og fastsættelse af sagsomkostninger i en retssag – medlemsstaternes procesautonomi – effektivitetsprincippet.#Sag C-459/25.

Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-459/25 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-01

Title: Domstolens dom (Niende Afdeling) af 1. oktober 2026.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – forbrugerbeskyttelse – direktiv 93/13/EØF – artikel 6, stk. 1, og artikel 7, stk. 1 – urimelige kontraktvilkår i forbrugeraftaler – lejekontrakt – klausul om, at samtlige omkostninger i forbindelse med retssagen skal bæres af lejeren, i tilfælde af at lejeren misligholder sine kontraktlige forpligtelser – virkningerne af, at dette vilkår findes urimeligt – anvendelse af deklaratoriske bestemmelser i national ret – fordeling og fastsættelse af sagsomkostninger i en retssag – medlemsstaternes procesautonomi – effektivitetsprincippet.#Sag C-459/25.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Gemini (gemini-3.8-flash)]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice held that Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC preclude a national court from substituting an unfair term requiring a defaulting tenant to bear all litigation costs with statutory default provisions of contract law; however, national procedural rules governing the general judicial allocation and assessment of court costs may still apply, provided they do not undermine the dissuasive effect of the Directive or infringe the principle of effectiveness.

EU Provisions Interpreted: Directive 93/13/EEC Art. 6(1), Directive 93/13/EEC Art. 7(1)

Practitioner Impact: Commercial lessors and consumer-facing enterprises cannot enforce contractual clauses shifting full legal costs onto consumers, and national courts must disapply such clauses entirely without contractual gap-filling, restricting cost recovery strictly to ordinary statutory procedural cost-allocation schemes.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-845/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 1. oktober 2026.#Silgan Holdings, Inc. m.fl. mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Appel – konkurrence – karteller – forordning (EF) nr. 1/2003 – artikel 11, stk. 6 – Europa-Kommissionens indledning af en procedure i en sag, der allerede behandles af en national konkurrencemyndighed – denne nationale myndigheds anmodning om, at Kommissionen overtager kompetencen – nærhedsprincippet – artikel 41 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – princippet om god forvaltning – rimelig frist ved behandling af sagen – Kommissionens meddelelse om samarbejdet inden for netværket af konkurrencemyndigheder – selvpålagt begrænsning af denne institutions skønsbeføjelse – begrundelsespligt.#Sag C-845/24 P.

Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-845/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-01

Title: Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 1. oktober 2026.#Silgan Holdings, Inc. m.fl. mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Appel – konkurrence – karteller – forordning (EF) nr. 1/2003 – artikel 11, stk. 6 – Europa-Kommissionens indledning af en procedure i en sag, der allerede behandles af en national konkurrencemyndighed – denne nationale myndigheds anmodning om, at Kommissionen overtager kompetencen – nærhedsprincippet – artikel 41 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – princippet om god forvaltning – rimelig frist ved behandling af sagen – Kommissionens meddelelse om samarbejdet inden for netværket af konkurrencemyndigheder – selvpålagt begrænsning af denne institutions skønsbeføjelse – begrundelsespligt.#Sag C-845/24 P.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-845/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 1. oktober 2026.#Silgan Holdings, Inc. m.fl. mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Appel – konkurrence –....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-855/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 1. oktober 2026.#Crown Holdings, Inc. og Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Appel – konkurrence – karteller – forordning (EF) nr. 1/2003 – artikel 11, stk. 6 – Europa-Kommissionen indledning af en procedure i en sag, der allerede er behandlet af en national konkurrencemyndighed – denne nationale myndigheds anmodning om, at Kommissionen erklærer sig kompetent – nærhedsprincippet – artikel 41 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – princippet om god forvaltningsskik – rimelig sagsbehandlingstid – Kommissionens meddelelse om samarbejdet inden for netværket af konkurrencemyndigheder – denne institutions egen begrænsning af sin skønsbeføjelse – begrundelsespligt.#Sag C-855/24 P.

Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-855/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-01

Title: Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 1. oktober 2026.#Crown Holdings, Inc. og Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Appel – konkurrence – karteller – forordning (EF) nr. 1/2003 – artikel 11, stk. 6 – Europa-Kommissionen indledning af en procedure i en sag, der allerede er behandlet af en national konkurrencemyndighed – denne nationale myndigheds anmodning om, at Kommissionen erklærer sig kompetent – nærhedsprincippet – artikel 41 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – princippet om god forvaltningsskik – rimelig sagsbehandlingstid – Kommissionens meddelelse om samarbejdet inden for netværket af konkurrencemyndigheder – denne institutions egen begrænsning af sin skønsbeføjelse – begrundelsespligt.#Sag C-855/24 P.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The Court of Justice delivered a binding ruling in C-855/24 establishing legal boundaries regarding Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 1. oktober 2026.#Crown Holdings, Inc. og Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH mod Eu....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-855/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 1. oktober 2026.#Crown Holdings, Inc. og Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Appel – konkurrence – karteller – forordning (EF) nr. 1/2003 – artikel 11, stk. 6 – Europa-Kommissionen indledning af en procedure i en sag, der allerede er behandlet af en national konkurrencemyndighed – denne nationale myndigheds anmodning om, at Kommissionen erklærer sig kompetent – nærhedsprincippet – artikel 41 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – princippet om god forvaltningsskik – rimelig sagsbehandlingstid – Kommissionens meddelelse om samarbejdet inden for netværket af konkurrencemyndigheder – denne institutions egen begrænsning af sin skønsbeføjelse – begrundelsespligt.#Sag C-855/24 P.

Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-855/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-01

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[C-845/24] [Court of Justice - Judgment] Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 1. oktober 2026.#Silgan Holdings, Inc. m.fl. mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Appel – konkurrence – karteller – forordning (EF) nr. 1/2003 – artikel 11, stk. 6 – Europa-Kommissionens indledning af en procedure i en sag, der allerede behandles af en national konkurrencemyndighed – denne nationale myndigheds anmodning om, at Kommissionen overtager kompetencen – nærhedsprincippet – artikel 41 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder – princippet om god forvaltning – rimelig frist ved behandling af sagen – Kommissionens meddelelse om samarbejdet inden for netværket af konkurrencemyndigheder – selvpålagt begrænsning af denne institutions skønsbeføjelse – begrundelsespligt.#Sag C-845/24 P.

Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: C-845/24 | Court: Court of Justice

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-10-01

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-139/23] [General Court - Judgment] Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Miskolci Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Unionens budget – forordning (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – generel ordning med konditionalitet til beskyttelse af Unionens budget – gennemførelsesafgørelse (EU) 2022/2506 – foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af Unionens budget mod tilsidesættelser af retsstatsprincippet i Ungarn – artikel 2, stk. 2, i gennemførelsesafgørelse 2022/2506 – forbud for Kommissionen mod at indgå retlige forpligtelser med truster af offentlig interesse eller med enheder, der ejes helt eller delvis af sådanne truster – artikel 4, stk. 1, i forordning 2020/2092 – begrundelsespligt – retssikkerhed – berettiget forventning – ret til forsvar – domstolsprøvelsens intensitet – proportionalitet – retten til at operere på et marked uden fordrejninger – artikel 16 i chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder – ligebehandlingsprincippet og princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling – ulovlighedsindsigelse.#Sag T-139/23.

Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-139/23 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-09-30

Title: Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Miskolci Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Unionens budget – forordning (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – generel ordning med konditionalitet til beskyttelse af Unionens budget – gennemførelsesafgørelse (EU) 2022/2506 – foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af Unionens budget mod tilsidesættelser af retsstatsprincippet i Ungarn – artikel 2, stk. 2, i gennemførelsesafgørelse 2022/2506 – forbud for Kommissionen mod at indgå retlige forpligtelser med truster af offentlig interesse eller med enheder, der ejes helt eller delvis af sådanne truster – artikel 4, stk. 1, i forordning 2020/2092 – begrundelsespligt – retssikkerhed – berettiget forventning – ret til forsvar – domstolsprøvelsens intensitet – proportionalitet – retten til at operere på et marked uden fordrejninger – artikel 16 i chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder – ligebehandlingsprincippet og princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling – ulovlighedsindsigelse.#Sag T-139/23.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-139/23 establishing legal boundaries regarding Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Miskolci Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Uni....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-132/23] [General Court - Judgment] Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Óbudai Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Unionens budget – forordning (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – generel ordning med konditionalitet til beskyttelse af Unionens budget – gennemførelsesafgørelse (EU) 2022/2506 – foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af Unionens budget mod tilsidesættelser af retsstatsprincippet i Ungarn – artikel 2, stk. 2, i gennemførelsesafgørelse 2022/2506 – forbud for Kommissionen mod at indgå retlige forpligtelser med truster af offentlig interesse eller med enheder, der ejes helt eller delvis af sådanne truster – artikel 4, stk. 1, i forordning 2020/2092 – begrundelsespligt – retssikkerhed – berettiget forventning – ret til forsvar – domstolsprøvelsens intensitet – proportionalitet – retten til at operere på et marked uden fordrejninger – artikel 16 i chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder – ligebehandlingsprincippet og princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling – ulovlighedsindsigelse.#Sag T-132/23.

Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-132/23 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-09-30

Title: Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Óbudai Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Unionens budget – forordning (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – generel ordning med konditionalitet til beskyttelse af Unionens budget – gennemførelsesafgørelse (EU) 2022/2506 – foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af Unionens budget mod tilsidesættelser af retsstatsprincippet i Ungarn – artikel 2, stk. 2, i gennemførelsesafgørelse 2022/2506 – forbud for Kommissionen mod at indgå retlige forpligtelser med truster af offentlig interesse eller med enheder, der ejes helt eller delvis af sådanne truster – artikel 4, stk. 1, i forordning 2020/2092 – begrundelsespligt – retssikkerhed – berettiget forventning – ret til forsvar – domstolsprøvelsens intensitet – proportionalitet – retten til at operere på et marked uden fordrejninger – artikel 16 i chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder – ligebehandlingsprincippet og princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling – ulovlighedsindsigelse.#Sag T-132/23.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-132/23 establishing legal boundaries regarding Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Óbudai Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Union....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-115/23] [General Court - Judgment] Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Debreceni Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Unionens budget – forordning (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – generel ordning med konditionalitet til beskyttelse af Unionens budget – gennemførelsesafgørelse (EU) 2022/2506 – foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af Unionens budget mod tilsidesættelser af retsstatsprincippet i Ungarn – artikel 2, stk. 2, i gennemførelsesafgørelse 2022/2506 – forbud for Kommissionen mod at indgå retlige forpligtelser med truster af offentlig interesse eller med enheder, der ejes helt eller delvis af sådanne truster – Rådets kompetence – ret til at blive hørt – retssikkerhed – ligebehandling – åbenbart urigtigt skøn – artikel 2 TEU – proportionalitet – artikel 13 i chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder – akademisk frihed – artikel 165 TEUF og 179 TEUF – fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser – artikel 56 TEUF.#Sag T-115/23.

Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-115/23 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-09-30

Title: Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Debreceni Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Unionens budget – forordning (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – generel ordning med konditionalitet til beskyttelse af Unionens budget – gennemførelsesafgørelse (EU) 2022/2506 – foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af Unionens budget mod tilsidesættelser af retsstatsprincippet i Ungarn – artikel 2, stk. 2, i gennemførelsesafgørelse 2022/2506 – forbud for Kommissionen mod at indgå retlige forpligtelser med truster af offentlig interesse eller med enheder, der ejes helt eller delvis af sådanne truster – Rådets kompetence – ret til at blive hørt – retssikkerhed – ligebehandling – åbenbart urigtigt skøn – artikel 2 TEU – proportionalitet – artikel 13 i chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder – akademisk frihed – artikel 165 TEUF og 179 TEUF – fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser – artikel 56 TEUF.#Sag T-115/23.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-115/23 establishing legal boundaries regarding Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Debreceni Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Un....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-140/23] [General Court - Judgment] Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Dunaújvárosi Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Unionens budget – forordning (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – generel ordning med konditionalitet til beskyttelse af Unionens budget – gennemførelsesafgørelse (EU) 2022/2506 – foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af Unionens budget mod tilsidesættelser af retsstatsprincippet i Ungarn – artikel 2, stk. 2, i gennemførelsesafgørelse 2022/2506 – forbud for Kommissionen mod at indgå retlige forpligtelser med truster af offentlig interesse eller med enheder, der ejes helt eller delvis af sådanne truster – artikel 4, stk. 1, i forordning 2020/2092 – begrundelsespligt – retssikkerhed – berettiget forventning – ret til forsvar – domstolsprøvelsens intensitet – proportionalitet – retten til at operere på et marked uden fordrejninger – artikel 16 i chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder – ligebehandlingsprincippet og princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling – ulovlighedsindsigelse.#Sag T-140/23.

Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-140/23 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-09-30

Title: Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Dunaújvárosi Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Unionens budget – forordning (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – generel ordning med konditionalitet til beskyttelse af Unionens budget – gennemførelsesafgørelse (EU) 2022/2506 – foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af Unionens budget mod tilsidesættelser af retsstatsprincippet i Ungarn – artikel 2, stk. 2, i gennemførelsesafgørelse 2022/2506 – forbud for Kommissionen mod at indgå retlige forpligtelser med truster af offentlig interesse eller med enheder, der ejes helt eller delvis af sådanne truster – artikel 4, stk. 1, i forordning 2020/2092 – begrundelsespligt – retssikkerhed – berettiget forventning – ret til forsvar – domstolsprøvelsens intensitet – proportionalitet – retten til at operere på et marked uden fordrejninger – artikel 16 i chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder – ligebehandlingsprincippet og princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling – ulovlighedsindsigelse.#Sag T-140/23.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-140/23 establishing legal boundaries regarding Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Dunaújvárosi Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →

[T-138/23] [General Court - Judgment] Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Semmelweis Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Unionens budget – forordning (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – generel ordning med konditionalitet til beskyttelse af Unionens budget – gennemførelsesafgørelse (EU) 2022/2506 – foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af Unionens budget mod tilsidesættelser af retsstatsprincippet i Ungarn – artikel 2, stk. 2, i gennemførelsesafgørelse 2022/2506 – forbud for Kommissionen mod at indgå retlige forpligtelser med truster af offentlig interesse eller med enheder, der ejes helt eller delvis af sådanne truster – begrundelsespligt – ret til at blive hørt – domstolsprøvelsens intensitet – proportionalitet – urigtigt skøn – magtfordrejning.#Sag T-138/23.

Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:00:00 +0000

Case: T-138/23 | Court: General Court

Document Type: Judgment | Date: 2026-09-30

Title: Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Semmelweis Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af Unionens budget – forordning (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – generel ordning med konditionalitet til beskyttelse af Unionens budget – gennemførelsesafgørelse (EU) 2022/2506 – foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af Unionens budget mod tilsidesættelser af retsstatsprincippet i Ungarn – artikel 2, stk. 2, i gennemførelsesafgørelse 2022/2506 – forbud for Kommissionen mod at indgå retlige forpligtelser med truster af offentlig interesse eller med enheder, der ejes helt eller delvis af sådanne truster – begrundelsespligt – ret til at blive hørt – domstolsprøvelsens intensitet – proportionalitet – urigtigt skøn – magtfordrejning.#Sag T-138/23.

🇪🇺 AI Executive Legal Brief [Legal Heuristic Engine]

Key Judicial Holding: The General Court delivered a binding ruling in T-138/23 establishing legal boundaries regarding Rettens dom (Mellemafdelingen) af 30. september 2026.#Semmelweis Egyetem mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union.#Gennemførelse af U....

EU Provisions Interpreted: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)

Practitioner Impact: Directly applicable precedent binding on all 27 EU Member State national courts and regulatory authorities.

Download Official PDF (341 KB) | View on EUR-Lex →